

Planning to use external offset credits | Not Specified |
Separate targets for emission reductions and removals | No |
Conditions on use of offset credits | None |
Plans for carbon dioxide removal (CDR) | Yes (nature-based and CCS-based removals) |
Additional notes: The Second Climate Change Report (2023) stated: "we seek to explore nature-based solutions (NbS) that contribute to CO2 capture and adaptation to physical risks in order to advance in the reduction of emissions, adaptation to climate change and the Group’s overall sustainability". In its roadmap for scope 1 it also said it would compensate for "all those emissions that are not feasible to abate" through the "Purchases of carbon credits and other alternatives" [Second Climate Change Report 2023: https://web.archive.org/web/20250627110110/https://www.antofagasta.co.uk/media/4592/climate-change-report_fv3.pdf] 2024 Sustainability Report: "We conducted engineering studies for the electrification of our operations at Los Pelambres, Centinela, and Antucoya. We also developed a strategy for offsetting non-mitigable emissions, evaluating various scenarios for the potential purchase of carbon credits, based on a 2024 market analysis." [2024 Sustainability Report p.70: https://web.archive.org/web/20250503062708/https://www.antofagasta.co.uk/media/4799/antofagasta-sustainability-report-2024.pdf] 2024 Sustainability Report: "By following best practices in the mining industry and using the Mitigation Hierarchy, a systematic approach that prioritises avoiding, minimising, and compensating for biodiversity impacts, we strive to minimise impacts on biodiversity, mitigating impacts, where possible, and offsetting remaining impacts, aiming to promote an approach with no net loss of biodiversity." [2024 Sustainability Report p.79: https://web.archive.org/web/20250503062708/https://www.antofagasta.co.uk/media/4799/antofagasta-sustainability-report-2024.pdf]
Ref | Principle |
Score
(points) |
Max
(points) |
Delta
(points) |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | At least 2 years of GHG emissions for scope 1 and 2 are publicly-available and externally-verified | 0.0 | 10.0 | 0.0 |
2 | Scope 3 emissions are fully reported and externally-verified | 0.0 | 10.0 | 0.0 |
3 | CDP score demonstrates the level of transparent disclosures | 8.0 | 10.0 | 0.0 |
Transparency | 8.0 | 30.0 | 0.0 | |
4 | Net Zero Commitments by 2050 include an intermediate target and cover all the emissions | 0.0 | 10.0 | 0.0 |
5 | Net Zero targets demonstrate a high-level of emergency | 0.0 | 10.0 | 0.0 |
6 | Emission reduction targets on a forward-looking basis are ambitious | 0.0 | 10.0 | 0.0 |
7 | Targets are science-based as validated by SBTi | 0.0 | 10.0 | 0.0 |
Commitments | 0.0 | 40.0 | 0.0 | |
8 | Results re. operational emissions reduction: on-pace (performance-to-date) and momentum (forward-looking targets) | 0.0 | 10.0 | 0.0 |
9 | Results re. value chain emissions reduction: on-pace (performance-to-date) and momentum (forward-looking targets) | 0.0 | 10.0 | 0.0 |
10 | Implied Temperature Rating by MSCi | 10.0 | 10.0 | 10.0 |
Results | 10.0 | 30.0 | 10.0 | |
Total | 18.0 | 100.0 | 10.0 |
Criteria | Results | 2024 Score | 2023 Score | Vs. 2023 | 2022 Score |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Criteria 1 : Transparency on operational emissions (Scope 1 + 2) | |||||
Are S1+S2 figures publicly-disclosed for the last reporting year and the preceding period? | NC | 0.0 / 5.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |
Are S1+S2 figures verified by a 3rd-party for the last reporting year? | NC | 0.0/ 5.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |
Criteria 2 : Transparency on value chain emissions (Scope 3) | |||||
Are the 15 categories fully or partly disclosed? | NC | 0.0 / 5.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |
Are S3 figures fully or partly verified by a 3rd-party for the last reporting year? | NC | 0.0 / 5.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |
Criteria 3 : Quality and Frequency of reporting | |||||
What is the latest CDP score (no later than the preceding year)? | B | 8.0 / 10.0 | 8.0 | 0.0 | |
How many interim reporting were provided between 2 reporting periods (GHG emissions only)? | |||||
Criteria 4 : Net Zero Commitments | |||||
Does the net 0 target include a statement of a generally-accepted net zero emission target by 2050? | NC | 0.0 / 3.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |
Does the net zero target include an intermediate target by 2030? | NC | 0.0 / 3.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |
Does the net zero target include all the emissions? | NC | 0.0 / 4.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |
Criteria 5 : Target year for Net Zero Commitments | |||||
Target year for achieving net zero emissions for S1+S2? | NC | 0.0 / 5.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |
Target year for achieving net zero emissions for S1+S2+S3 combined? | NC | 0.0 / 5.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |
Criteria 6 : Reduction objectives | |||||
What is the forward-looking GHG% reduction (without compensation) for scope 1+2? | 0.0 / 5.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | ||
What is the forward-looking GHG% reduction (without compensation) for scope 1+2+3? |
No target found
|
0.0 / 5.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |
Criteria 7 : Science-Based Targets | |||||
What type of science-based target (as validated by SBTi) did the company commit to? | NC | 0.0 / 10.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |
Criteria 8 : Results based on scope 1 - 2 | |||||
Performance to date: cumulative% reduction vs. target |
Objective (in %):
Actual (in %): The last reporting year could not be found
|
0.0 / 5.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |
Momentum: last year % reduction vs. forward-looking target |
Objective (in %):
Actual (in %): The last reporting year could not be found
|
0.0 / 5.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |
Criteria 9 : Results based on scope 1 - 2 - 3 | |||||
Performance to date: cumulative% reduction vs. target |
Objective (in %):
Actual (in %): The last reporting year could not be found
|
0.0 / 5.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |
Momentum: last year % reduction vs. forward-looking target |
Objective (in %):
Actual (in %): The last reporting year could not be found
|
0.0 / 5.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |
Criteria 10 : Implied Temperature Rise (ITR) | |||||
Is the company aligned with global climate targets? | ITR: 1.4°C | 10.0 / 10.0 | 0.0 | 10.0 | |
Total | 18.0 / 100.0 | 8.0 | 10.0 |